IAS 16 - Should Major Overhaul Costs Be Accrued in Advance?
💡 Learning IFRS with AuditCare Vietnam (ACV)
IAS 16 – Major Overhaul Costs and the “Accrual” Debate
IAS 16 – Property, Plant and Equipment
✈️ Should Major Overhaul Costs Be Accrued in Advance?
📅 Date: October 30, 2025
👤 By: Thủy Nguyễn ACCA
📘 Standards referenced: IAS 16, IAS 37, IFRS 16, Conceptual Framework
🧭 1. Why this topic matters
In practice — especially in aviation, oil & gas, and heavy manufacturing — many companies in Vietnam still “accrue” major maintenance costs for fixed assets, believing this approach ensures prudence and stable profits.
However, under IFRS, this long-standing practice does not comply with the definition of a liability and the recognition principles in IAS 16 and IAS 37.
This is a hot topic for airlines and lessors during IFRS conversion and audits.
⚙️ 2. IAS 16 – The principle of subsequent costs
IAS 16 distinguishes between day-to-day servicing and major inspections or replacements:
1️⃣ Routine maintenance → Expense as incurred (IAS 16.12)
2️⃣ Component replacement → Capitalise when the part is replaced, derecognise the old part (IAS 16.13)
3️⃣ Major inspection / overhaul → Capitalise when performed, depreciate until the next overhaul (IAS 16.14)
👉 In short: IFRS does not allow “pre-accruing” major repair costs that have not yet been incurred.
🧩 3. The IFRS conceptual logic – No “liability” without a past event
According to the Conceptual Framework (2018):
“A liability is a present obligation of the entity arising from a past event.”
A future overhaul — such as an aircraft’s D-check — is a future operating cost, not a present obligation.
The company can still avoid that obligation by discontinuing use of the asset.
Therefore, IAS 37 prohibits recognising provisions for future operating costs.
Only when a present legal or constructive obligation exists (e.g. return condition in a lease contract), can a provision be recorded.
✈️ 4. Application in the aviation industry
🛫 Owned aircraft
Capitalise the cost of major checks (C-check, D-check) when they occur.
Depreciate over the period until the next check.
Derecognise the remaining carrying amount of the previous check.
Do not accrue annually for future overhauls.
🛩️ Leased aircraft under IFRS 16
If the lease contract requires restoration to a specified condition → recognise a restoration provision (IAS 37) and add it to the ROU asset at commencement.
If the obligation is usage-based (e.g., tied to flight hours) → accrue costs progressively based on usage, not evenly across years.
This ensures consistency between economic consumption patterns and financial reporting.
⚖️ 5. IFRS vs VAS – Key differences
| Aspect | VAS Practice | IFRS Approach |
|---|---|---|
| Recognition basis | Prudence, expected future costs | Present obligation, past event |
| Common practice | Accrue maintenance annually | Capitalise when performed |
| Effect on P&L | Smooths expenses | Reflects true economic timing |
| Objective | Financial prudence | Faithful representation |
| Common issue | “Pre-accrual” of overhaul cost | Component & inspection accounting |
🧮 6. The IFRS approach: Component & inspection accounting
Instead of “saving up” for future overhauls, IFRS requires:
Capitalising the inspection cost when it happens;
Depreciating it until the next overhaul;
Derecognising any remaining balance of the previous component.
This avoids artificial liabilities and aligns expenses with asset use.
💬 7. Key takeaway
✅ Under IFRS, major overhaul or inspection costs cannot be accrued in advance unless there is a present legal or constructive obligation (IAS 37, IFRS 16).
✅ The correct approach is to capitalise when performed and depreciate to the next inspection.
✅ In industries like aviation, component accounting and proper cost tracking are essential for IFRS compliance.
🌐 8. Why it matters for Vietnamese companies
As Vietnam prepares for IFRS adoption, businesses need to:
Eliminate legacy “maintenance accruals”;
Implement component-based asset registers;
Review lease agreements for restoration clauses;
Train both finance and engineering teams to estimate component lives accurately.
This transition not only ensures compliance but also provides a more transparent and globally comparable financial position.
🧠 In short:
IFRS does not prohibit prudence — but it requires truth over tradition.
“Accruals” for future repairs may look safe, but they fail to meet IFRS liability criteria.
#LearningIFRS #AuditCareVietnam #IAS16 #IAS37 #IFRS16 #IFRSConversion #ComponentAccounting #AviationFinance #MajorOverhaul #PropertyPlantEquipment
Audit Care Việt Nam Newsletter
Join the newsletter to receive the latest updates in your inbox.